Comments for MomKat http://www.momkat.net Reminding myself that "It is impossible for self-righteousness to thrive on the slopes of the hill called Calvary" Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:33:07 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.4 Comment on NIV to Be Revised Again by BelieverInGod http://www.momkat.net/niv-to-be-revised-again/comment-page-1/#comment-51 BelieverInGod Fri, 02 Jul 2010 04:33:07 +0000 http://www.momkat.net/?p=106#comment-51 BLESS YOU! Thank you for the information, it seems they rewrite the NIV about as often as they rewrite the Book of Mormon. When will people understand that all of the KJV1611 Bible is the HOLY WORD OF GOD! BLESS YOU! Thank you for the information, it seems they rewrite the NIV about as often as they rewrite the Book of Mormon. When will people understand that all of the KJV1611 Bible is the HOLY WORD OF GOD!

]]> Comment on Liberal Bible Scholars Proven Wrong Again by MomKat http://www.momkat.net/liberal-bible-scholars-proven-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-42 MomKat Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:56:56 +0000 http://www.momkat.net/?p=109#comment-42 @Barnea Levi Selavan - thank you for your comment, and sharing more details of this discovery! @Barnea Levi Selavan – thank you for your comment, and sharing more details of this discovery!

]]> Comment on Liberal Bible Scholars Proven Wrong Again by Barnea Levi Selavan http://www.momkat.net/liberal-bible-scholars-proven-wrong-again/comment-page-1/#comment-41 Barnea Levi Selavan Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:45:41 +0000 http://www.momkat.net/?p=109#comment-41 Prog Galil's particular interpretation of the ostreacon is not universally accepted by scholars, as he insrerted many letters, and is not an epigrapher. However the majority of epigraphers, with the possible exception of C. Rollston, agree it is Hebrew. They disagree on content and context, but agree it is hebrew. As Dr Hagai Misgav says, and they did not just make up these letters now, it means it is even an older convention. The dating is based on carbon 14 dating of burnt olive pits and the typology of the pottery found in the context of the structures. Several dozen scholars agreed the pottery is early 10th century. See www.foundationstone.org and www.elahfortress.com and the HU Qeiyafa website for updates. Barnea Levi Selavan CoDirector Foundation Stone Prog Galil’s particular interpretation of the ostreacon is not universally accepted by scholars, as he insrerted many letters, and is not an epigrapher. However the majority of epigraphers, with the possible exception of C. Rollston, agree it is Hebrew. They disagree on content and context, but agree it is hebrew. As Dr Hagai Misgav says, and they did not just make up these letters now, it means it is even an older convention. The dating is based on carbon 14 dating of burnt olive pits and the typology of the pottery found in the context of the structures. Several dozen scholars agreed the pottery is early 10th century. See http://www.foundationstone.org and http://www.elahfortress.com and the HU Qeiyafa website for updates.

Barnea Levi Selavan
CoDirector
Foundation Stone

]]> Comment on Creation Science Videos Can Be Helpful Tools by Henry Morris IV http://www.momkat.net/creation-science-videos-can-be-helpful-tools/comment-page-1/#comment-6 Henry Morris IV Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:19:47 +0000 http://www.momkat.net/?p=68#comment-6 The Institute for Creation Research is no longer located in California, having moved it's headquarters to Dallas, Texas in 2007. The correct address is PO Box 59059, Dallas, TX 75229. The Institute for Creation Research is no longer located in California, having moved it’s headquarters to Dallas, Texas in 2007. The correct address is PO Box 59059, Dallas, TX 75229.

]]>